Detecting Set Over Set

[shipitfish]

I'm a big believer that NL HE players should sometimes be able to lay down sets in full ring games when set-over-set is a strong possibility. But, having been known for seeing monsters under the bed, I figured I should ask.

NL HE $200-buy-in $1/$2 blinds online: Limped pot with five players including big blind. I have $225, Unknown Player has just joined and bought in for $200 and has the big blind. I limp in cutoff with 4 4.

Flop is K T 4. I lead $5 into $9.80 when it is checked to me., I am check-raised to $25 by the Unknown Player. I make it $50 to go. At the time, I was really thinking about getting away from the hand if he came back over the top. He did, for all his chips, and I eventually called, thinking that I didn't know the player that well and sometimes players go crazy with top two. I figured he'd have raised preflop almost all the time with KK so his range is only KT and TT (most players where I play don't semi-bluff with the nut flush draw, but I guess I could throw specifically A Q to the mix). Also, the average player (which I have to declare him since he just joined) will sometimes raise from the big blind with TT, so that contributes a little bit to the odds he has that in the big blind. The statistics I could compute in the 15 seconds I had (no time bank on this site) seemed to indicate that even if he is twice as less likely to make the play with KT/A Q than he is with TT, I should probably call for roughly 1.5-to-1. Of course, he had TT, or I wouldn't be telling this story.

I can't really take a turn from his check-raise due to the heart draw, so I think the reraise was right most of the time. Maybe I should have reraised more on the flop, in which case it would have been an auto-call due to odds. His over-the-top for all his chips made it possible for me to fold, but I just couldn't do it. Should have I?

My game selection has gotten so good that I basically never get stacked anymore drawing this thin, so I'm hyper-aware when I do and want to be sure I did it right.

Comments

Re: set over set

[roryk.livejournal.com]

based on this there is no way you can fold.

he has two ways to have TT and six ways to have KT, so even if he bets out half the time with KT then he is still more likely to have KT than TT so it is impossible for you to even think about folding since you are more than even money against the range you are putting him on.

throw in the times he is overplaying some sort of hand you beat or a draw and shoving your money in there should be a no brainer.

Re: set over set

[roryk.livejournal.com]

two ways to have TT and nine ways to have KT even

draws unlikely here, but calling still correct

[shipitfish.livejournal.com]

While the analysis still says “no fold” if you eliminate all draw holdings, there is almost no way (like 99.99%), he has a draw other than A Q or A J. He'd have to be a complete anomaly on this particular site at this particular time. No one on the site in question at the limits I'm playing get frisky with their draws. They always check and call with draws, maybe bet out half the pot. But a check-raise? It's happening so rare you can ignore it. Now, since gutshot straight flush nut draws don't come that often, so I can throw in the specific two hands I mention because they are rare enough to excite some player, but generally speaking, these are meek players who do the obvious.

That said, we're all in agreement that unless I can virtually eliminate KT from the mix based on the action, I have to call because there's too many KT combinations.