While the analysis still says “no fold” if you eliminate all
draw holdings, there is almost no way (like 99.99%), he has a draw other
than A Q or A J. He'd have to be a complete
anomaly on this particular site at this particular time. No one on the
site in question at the limits I'm playing get frisky with their draws.
They always check and call with draws, maybe bet out half the pot. But
a check-raise? It's happening so rare you can ignore it. Now, since
gutshot straight flush nut draws don't come that often, so I can throw
in the specific two hands I mention because they are rare enough to
excite some player, but generally speaking, these are meek players who
do the obvious.
That said, we're all in agreement that unless I can virtually eliminate
KT from the mix based on the action, I have to call because
there's too many KT combinations.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
draws unlikely here, but calling still correct
Date: 2007-02-06 22:39 (UTC)While the analysis still says “no fold” if you eliminate all draw holdings, there is almost no way (like 99.99%), he has a draw other than A
Q
or A
J
. He'd have to be a complete
anomaly on this particular site at this particular time. No one on the
site in question at the limits I'm playing get frisky with their draws.
They always check and call with draws, maybe bet out half the pot. But
a check-raise? It's happening so rare you can ignore it. Now, since
gutshot straight flush nut draws don't come that often, so I can throw
in the specific two hands I mention because they are rare enough to
excite some player, but generally speaking, these are meek players who
do the obvious.
That said, we're all in agreement that unless I can virtually eliminate KT from the mix based on the action, I have to call because there's too many KT combinations.