![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
shipitfish[ This is the third part in a continuing series called So, You Want To Start Playing Poker?. The series is designed to help new players learn some basics about starting poker from the ground up.]
In a post about what game structure to select, I recommended two possible games: limit HE and NL HE. In this article, I discuss what books and materials are best to read for beginning the former.
Compared to NL HE, limit HE is much more of a technical game. Your understanding of the mathematical odds, starting hand selection, and technical details of play will determine much of your success at the lowest limits of HE. You'll need lots of practice to understand the concepts involved, but much of the hard information you'll need is available in books.
Jones Is Your Best First Choice
The book that opens most players' eyes to poker “book learning” is Lee Jones' Winning Low Limit Hold 'Em. It's the book I used when I taught the poker course at the Cambridge Center for Adult Education. I read it many times myself when starting limit. The cover literally fell off of my copy of Lee Jones' first edition. While his second edition covers some things about NL HE, it is basically only for online “Sit and Go” tournaments.
Lee Jones does a very good job helping you understand starting hand selection and the very basics of preflop odds, pot odds and implied odds (and their limited use in limit HE). However, I believe his starting hand selection suggestions are far too loose. If you follow his starting hand recommendations exactly, you'll find yourself in a number of complicated situations. Granted, you'll have position (acting last — a central component of HE poker) when these situations come up. But, there is really no reason for a new player to make marginal choices. Avoid the goofier hands he suggests for late position.
The other downside to Jones' book, one that I didn't discover until much later, is that the material is carefully tuned for play in the extremely loose limit HE games of California. California poker is somewhat unique, because many people in the games are playing poker not because of a direct interest in the game, but because it's the only available legalized “gambling” there. Many individuals who would be playing other games (say, craps) are playing poker instead. This leads to many a poker hand played out more like a craps roll. Jones' advice is designed for those types of games — as if you are playing the house against people taking 8 the hard way.
Those caveats aside, Lee Jones' book is probably the most important book on limit HE on the market. I mention these downsides only to make sure you don't treat it as a poker bible, the way many of us did when we started with limit HE. It's a great book and you'll learn a lot. However, try to move quickly to getting enough knowledge and experience to see the places where Jones is giving bad advice for those games you play and learn to adjust it to suit your needs.
Krieger May Be Overrated
Many people recommend Lou Krieger's Hold'Em Excellence series of books for beginners. I'm less enthusiastic about them than most. I like Lou and think he writes well, but I think his books fail to give enough step-by-step advice (i.e., “when you have situation X, usually you should do Y”). New players really need this type of advice as they get started. Lou focuses more on general concepts for beginning to win. Of course, they are good concepts, but I think you'll pick them up just as easily in other books that also include step-by-step advice.
Lou is also the co-author of Poker for Dummies. Despite the inappropriate titles (I don't think someone who lacks knowledge and seeks it is ever a dummy), I'm actually a fan of some of the dummy books. Their editors are usually good at designing books to give good quick introductions. I read Poker for Dummies early in my poker learning process. I was less impressed with it than other dummy books, primarily because it tried to cover all forms of poker in one volume, which is really difficult for new players. Poker is just one of these areas where you have to start a bit specialized. Trying to generalize too early will only make it difficult for you to begin booking wins early; this may decimate your confidence. Poker is somewhat unique in that you can get benefit from specializing early, but try not to stay one for too long.
Maybe Burton To Start?
I can't help but mention the book that got me started with limit HE. I was going on a Foxwoods vacation with my in-laws, and had just discovered that casino poker actually existed (more on that sometime when I write a history of how I got into poker). I literally ran (they were about to close) the night before to the book store, after googling around about.com for more information. I found a book written by about.com's casino author, Bill Burton.
Reviews of his book, Get the Edge at Low-Limit Texas Hold'em say that he teaches a “tight-weak” strategy. However, if you want an overnight crash course so you won't be a total fish at extremely low limits, this may be the right book. It's written very simplistically with basic ideas and simple-minded tactics. I found it got me up to speed so I could hold my own without burning through too much bankroll as a total HE newbie, playing the $2/$4 limit HE games at Foxwoods. Tight-weak doesn't do too bad in these games, because no one there makes any bluffs, and raises in multi-way pots nearly always mean the nuts or close to it. Burton basically recommends simple statistical play, gaining most of your edge from starting hand selection and folding unless you flop top-pair, strong kicker or better. This approach actually does work in the loosest, highest rake, lowest limit games at the casino. (Remember, BTW, that the rake is really heavy at the lowest limits and you can sometimes be a favorite to a game but an underdog to the rake.)
Be Selective With Books, Just Like With Starting Hands
There are so many poker books on the market now you could break your first bankroll just buying the books. Try to get books you aren't sure about from the library first (if you can — few libraries carry a strong poker book selection), or borrow from a friend (those in NYC are welcome to contact me if they'd like to borrow some). Read through them first to see if they are worth owning and rereading. Nearly every poker book (even Hellmuth's stinker of a book, Play Poker Like the Pros, which I borrowed from Boston Public Library) that I've seen is worth a quick read, but few are worth owning. Poker books are expensive under the theory that you can “win the cost of the book in one session of applying its principles”. But, I'm not a fan of this theory. Some poker books are more or less a scam by pros to find some extra easy money; Hellmuth's is the best example. Make sure you pick the good ones that many other players recommend.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
small stakes holdem
Date: 2006-03-20 04:31 (UTC)You will only win when you fuse the advice from those books with some poker instincts and experience. When you are starting off at limit holdem, if you follow the beginner advice, you will amost certainly slowly leak away money (as oppsed to seeing a wild ride with some big wins and some devistating losses).
Re: small stakes holdem
Date: 2006-03-20 05:07 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-20 09:48 (UTC)And they thought I'd be pleased.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-20 19:57 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-20 19:29 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-20 19:55 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-20 20:07 (UTC)The Small Stakes Hold 'em book is not really that advanced. It lays out all the fundamentals you need. Really, if you are not thinking about pot odds and odds and all of that when you play poker then what are you thinking about? Those are the things new players need to know. Those are the things that beat low limit games, just sitting there, playing a bunch of multiway friendly hands and then making a bunch of +EV, pure math-based decisions. That's how you beat low limit limit hold'em. That and having patience to follow that formula. That's all there is to it. Only when you get to the middle limits do any of the other poker skills that everyone thinks is what poker is, like bluffing and all of that stuff come into play.
When 6+ people are seeing every flop, it's all odds, all based on the size of the pot and your odds to continue and your chance of winning. And the Small Stakes Hold'em book stresses that. I think no other book is really worth reading when you are starting out. It teaches the right way to think about the game from the beginning.
But not all low stakes games are so loose
Date: 2006-03-20 23:01 (UTC)I'm not refuting anything you said. I'm just saying that even the advice in Small Stakes Hold'em will provide a nice foundation, but not make a new player an immediately winning player. Back in the day I believe new player could follow the cookbook and make money.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-20 20:23 (UTC)Your opponents read books too, and you should know what they have read so you can understand how they are thinking.
Play Poker Like the Pros is a great example. One time at Foxwoods, some guy I was playing with was talking about that book at our table. I have read that book (and actually tried out his limit strategy for a little while as an experiment) and from that I instantly knew that he would severely overvalue pocket pairs preflop and on the flop. I would not know that if I had not taken the time to sit down and read the book. I knew the book sucked but I read it anyway just to see what Hellmuth thought about limit poker. It cost like $10 for me to buy, and now if I ever need to refresh on it, I can just pull it off my bookshelf and flip it open and take a look at it. Well worth the cost. I think I have close to 80 poker books and I've read all of them multiple times-- some of them are very bad, but even the ones that I thought were very bad I got something out of them because I've gone through them and corrected them which was a good exercise. I dunno, I don't see how it can be bad to get other people's perspectives on the game you are playing and to have those perspectives instantly available to you whenever you want them. I have found some huge gems buying poker books that I thought were going to be absolutely terrible; two of the best poker books I have ever read were ones I bought just because I basically buy all poker books I come across that I don't have. My #4 poker book of all time is on 5 card draw! I am a bookworm though so my perspective is skewed.
That being said there are a bunch of books at the store now I can't bring myself to buy. Most of Hellmuth's other books I don't even really look at. There are a bunch of really really crappy books out, like you said. When I flip through them they are so terrible I know I won't find anything in them at all. But there are a bunch of "bad" books, like the Gary Carson book, that had a bunch of good stuff in it. The John Vorhaus books, which I didn't think were good books really, I really liked anyway. I wouldn't recommend them to people, but I would recommend they read them at some point anyway if they go crazy into poker. It's the books that are mostly pictures of cards that have very very little text with HUGE FONTS and lots of white space that I don't buy. And I don't think anyone should buy those books-- those are probably a waste of money.
Matthew Hilger
Date: 2006-03-22 21:29 (UTC)Play Poker Like the Pros
Date: 2008-01-13 15:30 (UTC)I'm very interested in hearing from the more experienced players here, specifically what makes the book a "stinker".
Mike