I Should Be Able To Make This Lay Down
Thursday, 23 February 2006 23:08Most of my readers will probably think I am insane for considering this
laydown in this situation. I think, however, that I misplayed this
hand. I also have somewhat of a moral obligation to post this, as
nick_marden once lost a big pot with a very similar situation
and I told him what I am telling myself at the end of this post.
I was playing $1/$2 NL HE, $200 max online at Full Tilt Poker. Historically, these games are the types of tight weak games I've written about so often. However, lately, they have been more loose-passive.
I was at a six player table, and a few people had busted. We were
dealt a hand with three people suddenly after two people left
simultaneously (one busted and one left on his own). I was in the
BB
with J
J
. The button, Quyzzie, raised to
$7, which was a standard preflop raise. I hadn't been at the table
but for a dozen hands, but Quyzzie was playing pretty loose from
what I saw, but not with his preflop raises. His vice seemed to be
bad one-pair hands on the flop.
The largest stack at the table, who seemed to be a strong player (named Mikechike) made it $20 to go from the SB. I gave Mikechike credit for a big hand here. I figured he had a pair between TT-AA, AK, or AQ.
I had a tough decision. I felt that it was a tough laydown to make three-handed, and a reraise from Quyzzie meant I had to fold preflop. I had $252 behind, Mikechike had me covered ($258), and Quyzzie had only $87. I decided to call the $18 cold, and be done with the hand if Quyzzie reraised or if I missed the set. Quyzzie just called.
The flop came J
5
A
. Mikechike paused for a moment and bet $18
into the $60 pot. I actually considered a set of aces as a possible
hand. AK was the other very likely possibility, making his bet
hoping that someone with a weaker ace would raise . But, I was
realistically worried about AA (for all the good it did me).
I decided to set Quyzzie all-in. This way I could look to Mikechike like I wanted to be heads up with Quyzzie, and force him to a decision knowing one player would be all-in. (I expected Quyzzie to call with any Ace, and it seemed somewhat likely he had one — my feeling about his preflop raise was Ace-high.) I made it $67 to go. Quyzzie insta-called (yes, I usually try to avoid that cutesie online poker term.). I really felt he would have thought some about putting his stack at risk with KK or a flush draw, so I was pretty confident he had an Ace. Mikechike called somewhat quickly behind him.
I thought Mikechike might have a flush draw here, but I realized after
the hand I couldn't put him on this. The only one that made sense is
K
Q
, and it would have been pretty odd preflop
behavior for that holding. In a sense, I think I have to put him on
exactly AA at that point, because he'd take the opportunity to protect
AK. (Remember, my only read on him is that he's a pretty good,
reasonable player.)
Therefore, when the turn falls T
, Mikechike checks, and and the pot stands at $261, I think
I can check instead of betting my last $166 (which is what I did).
Of course, Mikechike "insta-called" in his own right. Mikechike had
the only hand that made sense —
A
A
. (For the curious, Quyzzie had A
Q
— overplaying one pair again. Again,
for all the good it did me, my read on Quyzzie was right.)
If I instead check the turn, and that 7
that came on the river arrives, Mikechike likely puts in a
value bet. I may have to call up to $100 there, but I might be able
to fold for all-in. Indeed, AK seems even less likely when he just
checked the turn. Meanwhile, if I check the turn, and the flush
doesn't come, how much if any should I call when he value bets top
set?
Finally, is this all just a stupid marginal discussion? Should I have made the "more obvious" right play of folding preflop, even though we were three-handed?
I have to admit Mikechike played it as I would have — trying to sell it as a flush draw to two obviously made hands that can't have anything but runner-runner flush outs, and therefore they are left drawing dead on the turn. Even if Quyzzie does have the flush draw, Mikechike can safely check the turn, because I conveniently already charged Quyzzie the maximum to see the river. But, I should have seen past it because no flush draws coincide with the preflop action.
I think I should be ashamed of myself. If it's the 5
J
A
instead of the A
5
J
, maybe the flush draw with an AK
becomes more likely and I have to just take the beat. But the board
the way it was, I should have walked away $166 richer than I did.
Anyway, all I have left to say to myself (on Mikechike's behalf) on this hand is: Ship It, Fish!
no subject
Date: 2006-02-24 15:25 (UTC)Putting players on hands is very difficult for me, it's one of my worst flaws.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-24 15:51 (UTC)I think AJ is highly unlikely. I think he'd probably just call the $7 and take a flop from the SB with that, even three handed. To put that preflop reraise in, I believe strongly he needed AK, AQ, or TT-AA. After the flop action, there are basically only two hands I can consider — AK and AA. I thought at the time K
Q
was a reasonable (if remote) possibility, but in later analysis,
it's clear I shouldn't have been considering that hand at all, since while
the flop action is consistent with that holding, it's as unlikely as it is
with AJ that he'd reraise preflop from the SB with KQs.
I really feel that I lost the $67 on the flop honorably, but I have to move my read to purely AA after he just calls that. Even though I knew only a little about his play, I have to be able to make the connection and realize the only hand he reraises with preflop and slow plays on the flop is AA.
There's also an argument that I should have folded preflop. I'm really trying to decide which of those two was correct. Steven, are you out there? I need your brilliance on this one. :)
no subject
Date: 2006-02-24 15:53 (UTC)