all-in protection

Date: 2006-02-01 03:56 (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I was confused by the post; I assume the site was NOT pokerroom (the only site you mentioned)and you are refraining from naming the site. If so, I can take a shot at who the site is (I'm not sure why you aren't mentioning it, but I won't either). If it is that site or a similar site, then your proposal of providing a few minutes for disconnects isn't a practical solution. I am constantly disconnected from the unnamed site; sometimes I can't log back in for several minutes. This constant disconnection doesn't regularly happen for me on other sites, so I suspect it isn't my connection at home, which maintains a reliable connection to IM. If this site did not have all-in protection, they would have so many pissed-off players who would be regulary disconnected, potentially losing a pot. That would likely make a lot of angry players. I would think that, in such a case, they are better off providing an limited all-in protection policy. Of course, the best solution is to solve the crappy software problem; unfortunately their most recent "upgrade" demonstrated the quality of their work, so I admit to a healthy fear of the next one.
(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

Profile

shipitfish: (Default)
shipitfish

November 2016

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27 282930   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Wednesday, 24 December 2025 19:35
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios