I presume you mean, "Why say anything to him when he got angry about
putting my hand further into the muck?" I believe I did so because I
wanted to draw attention the fact that the rule is there for collusion
detection. But, you have a good point; it might have been better to
not say a word.
Why I spoke
Date: 2005-02-06 03:13 (UTC)I presume you mean, "Why say anything to him when he got angry about putting my hand further into the muck?" I believe I did so because I wanted to draw attention the fact that the rule is there for collusion detection. But, you have a good point; it might have been better to not say a word.