I don't really play NL very much so my opinion about the quality of the games is probably not as accurate as your opinion, but that's just what I thought.
I definitely was one of the people saying the $20/40 game was better than the $10/20 game-- I guess that is still probably true. I think in general the highest game in the room or on the site winds up being better than the games in the middle, up to a point of course. I guess what I meant is I just can't imagine going down there and playing $10/20 and being against a super tough lineup, since the people who have graduated from that lineup are now playing $20/40 and those players do not play very well. Most of the regulars regularly make terrible laydowns and miss value bets like mad.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Re: NL games at FW
Date: 2006-08-29 18:53 (UTC)I definitely was one of the people saying the $20/40 game was better than the $10/20 game-- I guess that is still probably true. I think in general the highest game in the room or on the site winds up being better than the games in the middle, up to a point of course. I guess what I meant is I just can't imagine going down there and playing $10/20 and being against a super tough lineup, since the people who have graduated from that lineup are now playing $20/40 and those players do not play very well. Most of the regulars regularly make terrible laydowns and miss value bets like mad.