His general non-specific answers are the sign of a weak player and a weak mind
This is ludicrous.
I don't necessarily disagree with your analysis past this, but the whole hand comes down to the liklihood of this guy's folding. And Bradley having AQs isn't an issue at all. The fact that he is a slight favorite against this guys range only exists because he does have an overcard. Sure it makes sense to wait til your egdes are bigger against guys like this. But to say you should never gamble with them seems a bit myopic to me. If this were a regular game, or someone Bradley will log lots of hours with online, then he basically has to play this hand the way he did. Although I think he should make his flop raise bigger.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Re: Bob Ciaffone?
Date: 2006-04-11 14:58 (UTC)This is ludicrous.
I don't necessarily disagree with your analysis past this, but the whole hand comes down to the liklihood of this guy's folding. And Bradley having AQs isn't an issue at all. The fact that he is a slight favorite against this guys range only exists because he does have an overcard. Sure it makes sense to wait til your egdes are bigger against guys like this. But to say you should never gamble with them seems a bit myopic to me. If this were a regular game, or someone Bradley will log lots of hours with online, then he basically has to play this hand the way he did. Although I think he should make his flop raise bigger.