I felt he had a TT “twice as often” as KT. In other words,
I just felt that half the time he had KT, he would bet out. I couldn't
eliminate KT entirely. Since I did believe he'd make the check-raise with
KT some of the time, and since KT is a more common statistical hand as TT,
much that “sureness&rquo; was offset by the mere statistics of the
cards. In live poker, I might have been able to make the laydown based on
a visual read, but online, you just have to go with the math.
Re: set over set
I felt he had a TT “twice as often” as KT. In other words, I just felt that half the time he had KT, he would bet out. I couldn't eliminate KT entirely. Since I did believe he'd make the check-raise with KT some of the time, and since KT is a more common statistical hand as TT, much that “sureness&rquo; was offset by the mere statistics of the cards. In live poker, I might have been able to make the laydown based on a visual read, but online, you just have to go with the math.